Interview Questions? Not Relevant Anymore

The traditional job interview is a relic of a bygone era. In today’s fast-paced and ever-changing workplace, the old-school approach to interviewing is simply not effective.

There are a number of reasons why interview questions are no longer relevant. First, the world of work has changed dramatically in recent years. The rise of technology has led to new ways of working and the skills and experience that employers are looking for have evolved accordingly.

Second, traditional interview questions are often too general and open-ended. They don’t give employers the specific information they need to make a hiring decision. As a result, interviewers often end up spending the majority of the interview time asking follow-up questions, which can be time-consuming and inefficient.

Third, traditional interview questions can be biased. For example, questions about a candidate’s marital status or family plans can be seen as discriminatory.

So, what’s the alternative? There are a number of new and innovative approaches to interviewing that are gaining popularity. One popular option is behavioural interviewing. Behavioural interviewing focuses on asking candidates questions about their past experiences. This allows employers to get a better understanding of how a candidate would behave in a particular situation.

Another option is situational interviewing. Situational interviewing asks candidates how they would handle hypothetical situations. This can be a helpful way to assess a candidate’s skills and abilities.

Finally, assessment centers are becoming increasingly popular. Assessment centers involve a series of activities that allow employers to assess a candidate’s skills, abilities and personality.

But assessment days come with some pros and cons.

It is a fair and accurate method of choosing a candidate.

It not only aids in the selection of the best candidate for the job, but it also broadens the participants’ knowledge, improves their thinking process and increases their productivity at work.

It provides an opportunity for persons who are talented but were unable to demonstrate their potential since their employment did not require it.

They allow interviewers to evaluate current performance as well as forecast future work performance.

Because the assessments are similar to the role, it provides candidates with a better understanding of the role for which they have applied.

Considering some of the cons, assessment days are both expensive and time-consuming. Each assessor will spend at least three days at the assessment centre: one day for training, one day for assessing and one day for making a judgement.

Assessment days necessitate highly trained observers since observers may bring their own perspectives and prejudices to the evaluation.

Those who receive unfavourable evaluations may feel demotivated and lose faith in their talents.

Personal qualities investigated through assessment centre exercises cannot be accurately measured even after three or four days.

A Game-Changing Alternative

One game-changing alternative to traditional interview questions is work samples. Work samples are tasks that simulate the actual work that a candidate would be doing in the job. This can be a very effective way to assess a candidate’s skills and abilities.

For example, if you are hiring a software engineer, you could ask the candidate to complete a coding challenge. This would give you a good idea of the candidate’s technical skills.

Work samples can be a very effective way to assess a candidate’s skills and abilities. They are also more relevant to the needs of today’s employers than traditional interview questions.

These are just a few of the new and innovative approaches to interviewing that are gaining popularity. These approaches are more relevant to the needs of today’s employers and they can help to ensure that the best candidates are hired.

error: